Inzichten · Definitions

What is agentic RAG, and how is it different from a chatbot?

Agentic RAG is retrieval-augmented generation put to work by agents. The retrieval part grounds every answer in your own data. The agentic part means the system does not stop at answering: it takes the next action inside your systems.

1 min. leestijd

Start with RAG: answers grounded in your data

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) means the model does not answer from memory. Before it writes a word, the system retrieves the relevant passages from your own content: documentation, policies, case history, product data. The answer is generated from those passages and cites them.

That single design choice changes the failure mode. An ungrounded model produces plausible text. A grounded one produces text supported by your sources, and when the sources do not support an answer, it can say so instead of inventing one.

Add the agentic part: systems that act

A chatbot ends at the reply. An agent continues: it opens the case, books the appointment, updates the record, routes the exception to a human with context attached. Agentic RAG uses grounded retrieval as its evidence base and then executes the next step inside the systems you already run.

Where the Synthesiser comes in

In our deployments that looks like multi-agent systems: a coordinating Synthesiser directs specialised domain agents, each calibrated to its slice of the problem. The agents cite their sources, attach a confidence level, and push back when an input contradicts the evidence.

The test that tells them apart

Ask one question of any vendor: when the conversation ends, what changed in your systems? If the answer is nothing, it is a chatbot. If cases were resolved, records updated, and work moved forward with an audit trail, it is an agent.

When the conversation ends, what changed in your systems? If the answer is nothing, it is a chatbot.

60-80%fewer false cases reach a support teamnoise-filtering agent
Secondsfirst response on routine cases, 24/7first-response agent
Questions

Asked and answered.

Is agentic RAG just RAG with extra steps?

No. RAG grounds the answer; agency changes what happens after the answer. An agentic RAG system retrieves evidence, decides, and then executes the next step inside your systems, with sources and an audit trail.

Does agentic RAG need my data to leave my environment?

It should not. Retrieval and grounding can run entirely inside your environment, so the agents reason over your data where it already lives. That is how we deploy it.

Where does a chatbot still make sense?

Where answering genuinely is the whole job, like a public FAQ. The moment the answer should trigger work, routing, booking, resolving, updating, you want an agent, not a chatbot.

Slimmer werken, niet harder

Put this to work on your own systems.

Every engagement starts with a conversation, grounded in your data.